HISTSEX Archives 5-10 Dec 2003

© Lesley Hall and list contributors


From: "Donna Larsen" <ladydonna85@hotmail.com>

Sent: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 03:58:30 +0000

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Recommondation request

 

I am doing a independent study on "The Critical Study of Consent in personal

relations. One aspect I want to look at is the way cults work, because they

get or appear to get a person's consent to do what they do. Can anyone

recommend a good book to read on cults and the way they work. I am looking

for something that is not necessarily derogatory toward them but more or

less neutral but honest about how they work.

From: "Michel Faber" <michelfaber@ablach.freeserve.co.uk>

Sent: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:44:18 -0000

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Recommondation request

 

Donna Larsen wrote:

> I am doing a independent study on "The Critical Study of Consent in personal

> relations. One aspect I want to look at is the way cults work, because they

> get or appear to get a person's consent to do what they do. Can anyone

> recommend a good book to read on cults and the way they work. I am looking

> for something that is not necessarily derogatory toward them but more or

> less neutral but honest about how they work.

There is, or was, an academic periodical called 'Journal For The Scientific

Study Of Religion'. I have a couple of photocopies of articles from this journal

(on the Children of God and Jim Jones's People's Temple) each of which is

supported by substantial refs/bibliographies. If you have access to a good

academic library and they have copies of the JFTSSOR, you might find

articles on exactly the topic you require, or the bibliographies might point you

to appropriate books.

Best wishes,

Michel Faber

michelfaber@ablach.freeserve.co.uk

From: Lesley Hall <lesleyah@primex.co.uk>

Sent: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:32:45 GMT

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Talk at Dr Johnson's House - "Sex With Boswell"

 

Lunchtime Gallery Talk - 1.15pm Tuesday 9th December

2003

Julie Peakman, author of Mighty Lewd Books - The

Development of Pornography in Eighteenth Century

England, will give a a short talk at The Tyranny of

Treatment exhibition at Dr Johnson's House. In "Sex

With Boswell" she explores the private lives of

Georgian gentlemen and contemporary attitudes towards

sexuality.

The Dr Johnson's House Museum is located at 17 Gough

Square, London, EC4A 3DE (Tel: 020 7353 3745). There

is an admission charge to the museum (£4 for adults)

but no additional charge to join the tour.

From: RobD <robjld@webone.com.au>

Sent: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 22:52:39 +1100

To: <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Burton quote

 

Somewhere Richard Burton made comment along the lines English women did not

need to be subjected to clitoridectomy because their minds had been

padlocked shut by ignorance of sex.

Can anybody direct me to the precise source of the quote?

Thank you.

Robert Darby

Canberra

Australia

From: Haiduk Press <haidukpress@yahoo.com>

Sent: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 04:50:57 -0800 (PST)

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Symbolic rape

Hello,

I wonder if anyone would have information on the custom of carrying one's bride over the threshhold. It dates back to Roman times, when it presumably evoked the rape of the Sabines. But do any of the ancient writers state that explicitly?

Thanks in advance,

Andrew Calimach

From: "Ivan Crozier" <ivancrozier@hotmail.com>

Sent: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:13:47 +0000

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: RE: [histsex] Symbolic rape

 

Dear Andrew Calimarch,

It is not an ancient source, but may direct you to some: the issue is

discussed by Havelock Ellis in Love and Pain and by Fustel de Coulanges, La

Cite Antique, both with reference to marriage by capture.

There are many other refs in Ellis about marriage by capturefrom other

ethnic groups. See also McLennan or Westermarck on this ethnological

aspect--especially as they both might make comparisons with the Roman

material, as they do with regard other topics.

Cheerio, Ivan

Ivan Crozier,

Lecturer,

Science Studies Unit,

University of Edinburgh,

21 Buccleuch Place,

Edinburgh EH8 9LN,

Scotland

ivan.crozier@ed.ac.uk

ivancrozier@hotmail.com

From: Richard Sha <rcsha@american.edu>

Sent: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:59:27 -0500

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Recommondation request

 

this book has nothing to do with cults, but everything to do with consent. Carole Pateman The Sexual Contract. Pateman examines the extent to which social contract theory finesses the social contract by eliding that with a sexual contract--she thus queries the extent to which consent is truly consent.

From: David Sonenschein <sonend@yahoo.com>

Sent: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:31:31 -0800 (PST)

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Recommondation request

 

"Cult" panics have had a considerable history in the US (with similar

streams in the UK), the most recent waves beginning in the late 1960s

through the early 1990s. Check any library’s catalog on the subject

and look for entries that deal with "brainwashing" and "deprogramming"

for material relevant to issues of consent. Consent becomes most

problematic when images of seduced youth are central to the concerns,

as they were in the period I mentioned above (see also my _Pedophiles

on Parade_, both volumes for the historical continuities). I’d

recommend a start with the works and surveys by Anson Shupe and David

Bromley that cover reactions to the new religions coming out of the

1960s. Use of the word "cult" already establishes an ideological

marker, just as does the universal application of "abuse" to all

adult-youth sexual relations. It’s hard to imagine a "positive"

article on "cults."

From: "Donna Larsen" <ladydonna85@hotmail.com>

Sent: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 01:39:10 +0000

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Recommondation request

OF course good recommondation on consent would be appreciated for this

project, Thank you :)

From: "Terrence Lockyer" <lockyert@mweb.co.za>

Sent: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:14:51 +0200

To: "History of Sexuality" <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Re: [histsex] Symbolic rape

 

Andrew Calimach wrote

: >I wonder if anyone would have information on the custom of

: >carrying one's bride over the threshhold. It dates back to

: >Roman times, when it presumably evoked the rape of the

: >Sabines. But do any of the ancient writers state that explicitly?

I can't answer this directly, but I can say that symbolic rape as a feature

of marriage has been a topic in the past on the Classics-L. There is a

fully searchable public archive of that list (and a few others) on-line at

http://omega.cohums.ohio-state.edu/hyper-lists/

which may help with your question.

G. W. Williams, in the article s. v. "marriage customs, Roman" on p. 928 of

- Simon Hornblower and Anthony Spawforth (edd.), The Oxford Classical

Dictionary. Third edition (Oxford and New York : Oxford UP 1996)

mentions the ritual of carrying the bride over the threshold, but associates

it with the avoidance of "an ill-omened stumble", and has no mention of the

Sabine women at all, nor any reference to an ancient source, although he

does say in general that Plutarch's *Roman Questions* are an important

source for Roman marriage ceremonies. A work in Williams' bibliography that

would possibly be helpful, but which I do not have here, is

- Susan Treggiari, Roman Marriage (Oxford 1991)

The Sabine women as a legend reflecting the practice of marriage as capture

is mentioned on p. 217 of the general survey

- Elaine Fantham, Helene Peet Foley, Natalie Boymel Kampen, Sarah B.

Pomeroy, and H. A. Shapiro, Women in the Classical World: Image and Text

(New York and Oxford : Oxford up 1994)

but no connection is made to Roman marriage ritual.

If you like, I could post your query to Classics-L. Since that is

publicly-archived, I could post any replies here.

 

Terrence Lockyer

Johannesburg, South Africa

From: "Terrence Lockyer" <lockyert@mweb.co.za>

Sent: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 23:49:05 +0200

To: "History of Sexuality" <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Re: [histsex] Corrigendum: Symbolic rape

 

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, I cited

: G. W. Williams, in the article s. v. "marriage customs,

: Roman" on p. 928 of

:

: - Simon Hornblower and Anthony Spawforth (edd.), The

: Oxford Classical Dictionary. Third edition (Oxford and

: New York : Oxford UP 1996)

The headword of the article is actually "marriages ceremonies, Roman". The

text is unchanged from the same article on pp. 650-1 in

- N. G. L. Hammond and H. H. Scullard (edd.), The Oxford Classical

Dictionary. Second edition (Oxford : Clarendon Press 1970)

although the older edition has some German works that haven't made the

bibliography of the newer.

 

Terrence Lockyer

Johannesburg, South Africa

From: "Terrence Lockyer" <lockyert@mweb.co.za>

Sent: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:56:01 +0200

To: "History of Sexuality" <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Symbolic rape

Cc: <haidukpress@yahoo.com>

 

I paste below answers to Andrew Calimach's question from Classics-L.

On Saturday, December 06, 2003 11:55 PM, Allen Koenigsberg wrote

: from an anthropological (vel sim) point of view, isn't crossing

: any new "threshold" (boundary) fraught with peril? In that case,

: the carrying of the bride OVER the limen prevents a bad luck

: (price) from attaching to her. Her passage is eased and ill omens

: are diverted

:

: I think it has little to do with Sabine women per se - that's just an

: etiology looking for a circumstance.

On Saturday, December 06, 2003 11:57 PM, Lora Holland wrote

: Sounds like something Plutarch might address in Roman Questions.

: I don't have time to look for it, however...

Finally, and most helpfully for Andrew Calimach's original question, on

Sunday, December 07, 2003 12:29 AM, James P. Holoka wrote

: Yes, it's at Plut. _Quaest. Rom._ 271D: "Why do they not allow

: the bride to cross the threshold of her home herself, but those who

: are escorting her lift her over?" Three possibilities: (1) It is "because

: they carried off by force also the first Roman birdes and bore them

: in in this manner ...." (2) "They wish it to appear that it is under

: constraint and not of their own desire that they enter a dwelling

: where they are about to lose their virginity." (3) it is "a token that

: the woman may not go forth of her own accord and abandon her

: home if she be not constrained, just as it was under constraint that

: she entered it ...." (LCL).

So it seems that Plutarch at least connected the practice with the Sabine

women. LCL is the Loeb Classical Library, some of whose Plutarch is on-line

at the Perseus Project. This text (the *Roman Questions*) is not, however.

 

Terrence Lockyer

Johannesburg, South Africa

From: Wrdynes@aol.com

Sent: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:21:28 EST

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Mock marriages

Cc: Wrdynes@aol.com

 

For an article I am writing that is tangential to the current discussion of

same-sex marriage, I am looking for instances of mock marriages (male-male) in

which one of the two participants dresses up as a woman and becomes the "wife"

of the other, without any (or much) intention of a permanent simulation of

heterosexual marriage.

I am interested in examples from the last few decades, rather than Nero and

his congeners. As far as I know, Boswell's "brother-making" rites did not

involve cross-dressing.

About thirty years ago, as I recall, a French-Canadian male couple flew to LA

to get married. It was all a kind of charivari, and never aspired to legal

status. Then there were those rumors about the wedding of Rock Hudson and Jim

Nabors (apparently a spoof to get people to come to a party in San Francisco).

According to Jean Cocteau Picasso introduced him to Gertrude Stein as his

"fiancee." (Regrettably, there is no record of the celebration of the nuptials,

though there was a honeymoon trip to Rome.) Just now we have had Harvey

Fierstein as "Mrs. Claus."

Lesbian parallels are welcome too.

Are there any instances of a heterosexual couple dressing up as a gay or

lesbian couple?

Best, Wayne

From: "Terrence Lockyer" <lockyert@mweb.co.za>

Sent: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 21:55:53 +0200

To: "History of Sexuality" <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Roman thresholds again

Cc: <haidukpress@yahoo.com>

 

An off-list suggestion from a member of the Classics-L has sent me to

Petronius' *Satyricon*, specifically the "Dinner-Party of Trimalchio" (Sat.

26-78), which reveals a few Roman beliefs about thresholds.

At Sat. 30.6, as the hero and his companions enter the dining-room, they

encounter at the door a slave posted there to warn guests to enter

right-foot-first (the left being considered ill-omened), and there is an

exaggerated description of their fear lest any one of them break the

injunction. Here is the note from pp. 63-4 of

- Martin S. Smith (ed.), Petronii Arbitri Cena Trimalchionis (Oxford :

Clarendon Press 1975)

"it was thought lucky to start a journey or an enterprise by stepping off

with the right foot, avoiding a stumble, which was regarded as particularly

ill-omened if it occurred on the threshold. Vitruvius (iii. 3) has this

superstition in mind when in his instructions for building the stairway up

to a temple he advises the architect to provide an odd number of steps, so

that the worshipper will be able to use his right foot both for the first

step on the stairs and for entering the temple itself. Trimalchio, however,

is made to surpass ordinary superstitiousness by having someone bark out

*dextro pede* ["On the right foot!"] at the entrance to his dining -room."

Later (Sat. 72.10), as the hero and his companions try to slip away from the

party, they find their way barred, and are told that no-one may leave

Trimalchio's house by the same way s/he entered. This may be another

instance of his superstitions about thresholds, as suggested on p. 189 (n.

8) of

- J. P. Sullivan (tr., intr., nn.), Petronius: The Satyricon, and Seneca:

The Apocolocyntosis. Revised edition (Harmondsworth : Penguin Books 1986)

Given the presence of these kinds of beliefs, I would hesitate to see the

origin of brides' being carried over the threshold specifically in the rape

of the Sabines, whatever Plutarch may have thought (and even he is not

dogmatic). I also wonder if there may not be some significance attached to

the bride and groom entering their married home simultaneously.

Of course, one really feels for the poor groom who evidently had to carry

his bride, be careful to put his best (i. e., right) foot forward, not

stumble, and goodness knows what else!

 

Terrence Lockyer

Johannesburg, South Africa

From: Wrdynes@aol.com

Sent: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:43:46 EST

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Roman thresholds again

Cc: Wrdynes@aol.com

 

A proverbial instruction found in several Mediterranean cultures holds that

one's house should have only one entrance. This precept was enforced at the NY

appliance store, Crazy Eddy's (the owner was Lebanese), presumably to avoid

employee theft.

I always thought that the origin of the idea was this: so that the husband,

arriving home early, could catch an adulterer without his being able to leave

by another door. But it might be that malefactors in general cannot leave by

the door they enter, and are thus trapped. I would hate to rely on this as

burglar insurance, though.

Anyway, comonamyhouse! There's only one door.

Best, Wayne R. Dynes Hunter College

From: Lesley Hall <lesleyah@primex.co.uk>

Sent: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 21:37:26 +0000

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: RE: Burton quote

 

 

RobD wrote:

>

> Somewhere Richard Burton made comment along the lines English women did

> not

> need to be subjected to clitoridectomy because their minds had been

> padlocked shut by ignorance of sex.

>

> Can anybody direct me to the precise source of the quote?

I've been flicking through my unindexed copy of _Love, War and Fancy_ to

see if I could find this, but can only come up with the following.

On comparative practices of controlling women:

(in section 'Woman, the Domestic Calamity')

'Practically throughout the civilised world there are only two ways of

treating women. Moslems keep them close, defend them from all kinds of

temptations and if they go wrong, kill them. Christians place them on a

pedestal, the observed of all observers, expose them to every danger and

if they fall accuse and abuse them instead of themselves.... Women can

be thoroughly guarded only by two things, firstly their hearts and

secondly by the Spanish padlock.'

While on female ignorance, in section 'The Physical Woman':

'In England some women are idiots enought not to tell their daughters

what to expect on the wedding night.'

Neither quite what you are looking for I fear, but the system of

organisation is such that it is not easy, lacking an index, to track

down any particular passage.

Lesley Hall

lesleyah@primex.co.uk

website: http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah

From: "Dannielle Orr" <dorr@central.murdoch.edu.au>

Sent: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:06:54 +0800

To: <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Re: [histsex] Mock marriages

hello Wayne,

I've just been reading a new book that whilst maybe a bit short on references, is absolutely fantastic on photos!

It has lots of pictures from this last century in America, of women's mock marriages in all-women education institutions and (potentially) lesbian mock marriages.

The reference is,

Catherine Smith & Cynthia Greig

_Women in Pants: Manly Maidens, Cowgirls & Other Renegades_

published by Harry N. Abrams

2003

The photos are a delight. I noticed from somewhere in the book (the foreword, perhaps?) that the photos are from the authors' collection. It might even be worth contacting them to see if they have any male homosexual cards/ photos. Hope this helps,

cheers,

Dannielle Orr

Wayne wrote:

Lesbian parallels are welcome too.

Are there any instances of a heterosexual couple dressing up as a gay or

lesbian couple?

From: Stephen Morris <smmorris58@yahoo.com>

Sent: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 05:57:02 -0800 (PST)

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Mock marriages

 

-I remember something like this in something. Was it

*Don We Now Our Gay Apparel*?

Will try to check and see if it was that or something

else....

 

Stephen

-- wrdynes@aol.com wrote:

> Histsex: discussion list for historians of

> sexuality. List homepage

> http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah/listinf.htm

> For an article I am writing that is tangential to

> the current discussion of

> same-sex marriage, I am looking for instances of

> mock marriages (male-male) in

> which one of the two participants dresses up as a

> woman and becomes the "wife"

> of the other, without any (or much) intention of a

> permanent simulation of

> heterosexual marriage.

>

> I am interested in examples from the last few

> decades, rather than Nero and

> his congeners. As far as I know, Boswell's

> "brother-making" rites did not

> involve cross-dressing.

>

From: franz.eder@univie.ac.at

Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:32:26 +0100

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Publications/Bibliography on the History of Sexuality

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

I would be very interested in including all YOUR PUBLICATIONS on

the history of sexuality in Europe, the U.S. and Canada from 1700 to

2003 to the "Bibliography of the History of Western Sexuality" (

http://www.univie.ac.at/Wirtschaftsgeschichte/sexbibl/ ). The new

edition of this bibliography will be published at the beginning of the

next year.

 

Please email the relevant information to me at the following address:

franz.eder@univie.ac.at . Literature and references should include all

the standard details (full information can be found at the above-named

website).

 

(If you have sent your titles during the last 3 months we have already

added them to the second edition of the bibliography.)

 

Kind regards,

 

Franz Eder

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

* ao. Univ. Prof. Dr. Franz X. Eder

* Department of Economic and Social History

* University of Vienna

* Dr. Karl Lueger-Ring 1

* A-1010 Vienna

* Telephone: +43-1-4277-41321 or -41301

* Fax: +43-1-4277-9413

* E-Mail: franz.eder@univie.ac.at

* Homepage: http://www.univie.ac.at/Wirtschaftsgeschichte/_Eder.html

 

From: "Lesley Hall" <lesleyah@primex.co.uk>

Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:28:18 -0000

To: "Histsex:For historians of sexuality" <histsex@topica.com>

Subject: Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies: reviewers and referees required

 

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies - produced by the School of

Humanities, University of Newcastle (Australia) - is seeking to update its

database of suitably qualified people willing to write book reviewers or to

referee a paper.

Those interested should e-mail their name and contact details, plus a mini

CV that lists their research interests, teaching areas and any publications

to the contact below.

Cricos provider number 00109J

 

 

Christine Cheater

School of Humanities

Ourimbah Campus

University of Newcastle

Ourimbah, 2258

Ph: + 61 02 4349 4557

Fax + 61 02 4348 4078

Email: christine.cheater@newcastle.edu.au

From: David Greenberg <dg4@nyu.edu>

Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:57:30 -0500

To: histsex@topica.com

Subject: Re: [histsex] Publications/Bibliography on the History of

Sexuality

My sexuality-related publications, along with many not related to sexuality, are on my vita, which is attached. It is a WordPerfect file. David Greenberg


Back to Archives List
© Lesley Hall and list contributors